Skip to main content

Learn More
About Religious Liberty

"At the very heart of human freedom is the right to religious freedom, since it deals with man’s most fundamental relationship: his relationship with God." - Pope John Paul II, Address to Diplomats, January 2005

Religious Liberty at USCCB

NARAL Bill Takes Aim at Religious Employers (Again)

Printer-friendly version
June 8, 2017

Claiming widespread problems despite a complete lack of evidence, the National Abortion Rights Action League (NARAL) is once again targeting religious employers with a bill in the California legislature.

The latest effort is AB 569 by Assembly Member Lorena Gonzalez Fletcher (D-San Diego).  She and NARAL are claiming that religious employers are consistently discriminating against women based on their reproductive choices.

Despite supporters’ claims, only one such case has been discovered in a California religious organization in the last ten years and that was settled out of court, obscuring the facts of the case.  None have been found in “secular” organizations.

The supporters also target “codes of conduct” – common to all employers – saying that they often include “morality clauses” that discriminate.  Again, the only case they cite involved a code that was actually approved by a vote of a teacher’s union.

Strong protections against discrimination are already built into the Fair Employment and Housing Act (FEHA) but NARAL and a host of abortion providers throughout the state also want the provision in the Labor Code.  This is probably a deliberate strategy because the Labor Code does not include widely accepted exemptions for religious employers repeatedly upheld by the U.S. Supreme Court and other courts.

If approved the bill would open a whole new realm of lawsuits and legal battles.  And, for some inexplicable reason, AB 569 also gives the dependents of employees the right to sue employers.  Such a broad provision is found nowhere else in California law.

The author also claims AB 569 protects pregnant women from discrimination even though the word pregnancy appears nowhere in the bill.

The bill seems intentionally aimed at religious and faith-based organizations, which are allowed in tradition and through legal precedent to employee people who agree with the tenets of their faith.  Such protections, derived from the First Amendment, enable churches and their institutions to carry out their missions while still protecting employees on an equal, non-discriminatory basis.

AB 569 will probably be heard in the Senate Labor Committee and possibly the Judiciary Committee as well.  Voice your opposition to this unnecessary and disrespectful bill here